奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

Time for Things Labor, Leisure, and the Rise of Mass Consumption · 第 7 页

PDF 物理页索引 15 · FOR

书名
Time for Things Labor, Leisure, and the Rise of Mass Consumption
作者
未记录
印刷页
7
PDF 物理页
15(从 0 开始)
章节
FOR
UUID
10f0f318-a2eb-4ea9-8798-d4fb0304f8c3
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
5415f0a514b37d96e2ab3be714e2fc7472bf07e44f874aad420220f573f443d0

The commensurability of labor and wage made sense in the context of a particular understanding of the grounds on which an economic exchange can be considered fair. On this understanding, economic exchanges are fair when there is an equality between the exchanged substances. The emergence of mass consumption was closely connected to the increasing de facto legitimacy of wage-labor exchange, under this historically particular understanding of economic fairness, applied to wage labor. The fairness of wage labor exchange became possible through the establishment of an objective equivalence between labor and wage goods, as those goods came to signify free activity. This version of economic fairness was most clearly instantiated in the moral economy that underpinned the mid-century “Fordist” period of capitalism.

The Character and Scope of the Argument

The approach taken in this book is interdisciplinary, ranging across all the social sciences and diverse currents of historical research while also drawing on philosophical works. Especially in the theory sections of the book, I discuss a variety of sometimes conflicting paradigms. I ask my readers to consider approaches to social and economic phenomena with which they might be unfamiliar or perhaps might even think self-evidently wrong. The discussion turns on a dime, as it were, from neoclassical economics to Marxian accounts of capitalism, from economic anthropology to sociological theory, from political economy to behavioral psychology. At the same time, the book combines economic analysis, historical synthesis, sometimes quite speculative social theorizing, and interpretation of culture, bringing together methods and approaches that have their homes in diferent disciplines. But there are good reasons for tromping freely across disciplinary boundaries when considering big questions of the sort that are at the center of this book. When faced with very complex, multifaceted problems, the best approach is to regard the human sciences as a diverse tool kit, and, in order to gain some leverage on the problem, try out as many theoretical approaches and concepts as possible.

Introduction

7