奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

If...Then Algorithmic Power and Politics · 第 139 页

PDF 物理页索引 149 · IF...THEN

书名
If...Then Algorithmic Power and Politics
作者
未记录
印刷页
139
PDF 物理页
149(从 0 开始)
章节
IF...THEN
UUID
1d3bd28e-c1ba-4af2-8580-60b32ef26053
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
a6617ed4a0b8381181f14eda369ab6510e5d616543e3723d94fff20eacfe1e2d

As do many of the other informants, Larsen emphasizes the “democratic” function of news and the journalistic values. While he is open to the possibility of using algorithms to automate some limited and carefully controlled parts of the newspaper, he insists on the fundamental role of human editors in deciding what readers should know. The newspaper’s role, in Larsen’s view, is not to serve content based on individuals’ past clicking behavior. If something important just happened in the world, “it is our role to inform people about it and say ‘this is important, this is what you need to understand’ ” (Interview 20, March 2014). Key to this public information function is maintaining people’s trust in the newspaper as a credible source. The editors and managers talk about their brand name and the importance of having a distinct editorial line that people recognize. For some, the advent of an algorithmic logic in journalism seems to threaten the unique and recognizable editorial line that people have come to know. As Møller says when I ask about the prospect of using algorithms to personalize Politiken’s front page: “We want Politiken to remain a credible media outlet. The best way to accomplish that is through our own prioritizations, not through something automatic.” People come to Politiken because they know what “we stand for,” Møller adds. He explains, “One of our greatest values as a newspaper is that it is created by people with a specific worldview” (Interview 5, March 2014).

The informants’ concerns about the damaging efects of algorithms are familiar ones. Over the past decade, concerns about the algorithmic creation of so-called filter bubbles and echo chambers—the idea that users only get served more of the same content based on their own clicks—have regularly been voiced (Pariser, 2011). These discourses constitute an important backdrop against which the informants express their own concerns. There was a sense in which the linking of journalism and the computational almost required informants to reflect upon the perceived dangers of algorithmic personalization. While Jens Nicolaisen, digital director at

Programming the News

139