奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

Zombie Capitalism Global Crisis and the Relevance of Marx · 第 105 页

PDF 物理页索引 105 · Zombie Capitalism Global Crisis and the Relevance of Marx

书名
Zombie Capitalism Global Crisis and the Relevance of Marx
作者
未记录
印刷页
105
PDF 物理页
105(从 0 开始)
章节
Zombie Capitalism Global Crisis and the Relevance of Marx
UUID
4a3d22bd-c5b9-47a4-a022-bd35d44d9bfe
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
bab20127626396677194132fe1cfe34635f144ba09ef7696b525db320bff922a

it is not the state in general that must be analysed but "the specific political organisation of the world market in many states" . . . the role of the state in question in its specific relationship with the world market and with other states must always be included in the analysis from the outset. 63

Few people have followed through such attempts to develop such insights into a rigorous interpretation of the world system. But some of their presuppositions are taken for granted in everyday ways of talking and writing about the world. People habitually speak of "the economic interests" of this or that state, of how one is doing compared with another, of the "profits" of one or other country. So the recent very useful account of capitalism since the Second World War by Robert Brenner emphasises the interactions of "US capitalism", "Japanese capitalism" and "German capitalism", with negotiation by states playing a central role.64 There is the implication of a tight alignment of interest between a particular national state and a particular sector of the international capitalist system.

The view of national states as wholly congruent with "national" capitals is a big oversimplification, especially in today's world, with multinational corporations operating in scores of countries, as we shall see later. But this does not mean that states simply stand at "arms length" from particular capitals, or that states do not act at the behest of particular nationally based groupings of capital. They remain tied to them in complex ways.

The genesis of the capitalist state

A starting point for understanding this can be found in the relationship between the development of modern states and capitalism. This was not dealt with explicitly by Marx, and it was Engels who first did so in a manuscript written after Marx's death and not published until 1935. His studies led him to conclude that as merchants and tradespeople of the towns (the "burghers" ) grew in importance at the end of the Middle Ages they allied themselves with the monarchy against the rest of the feudal ruling class: "Out of the confusions of the people that characterised the early Middle Ages, there gradually developed the new nationalisms"-and the beginnings of national states very different to the earlier political structures.65

Beyond Marx: Monopoly, War and the State

105