奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

Zombie Capitalism Global Crisis and the Relevance of Marx · 第 240 页

PDF 物理页索引 240 · Zombie Capitalism Global Crisis and the Relevance of Marx

书名
Zombie Capitalism Global Crisis and the Relevance of Marx
作者
未记录
印刷页
240
PDF 物理页
240(从 0 开始)
章节
Zombie Capitalism Global Crisis and the Relevance of Marx
UUID
4a3d22bd-c5b9-47a4-a022-bd35d44d9bfe
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
284d6ca9ce0bf5bb24be8f6fe3c3449ddbdc8931c11185b1fa4ba90154aaaa88

There were, nevertheless, reasons for European-based capitalism to worry and to nag states to take action on its behalf. French and German based capitals faced the dilemma that although they were more productive in output per hour worked than capital based in the US11 they lost out in terms of overall productivity because of the few hours they got from each worker in a year.

European capital therefore found itself under pressure from at least three sides in global markets-from the US and Japan in high technology products and from China in lower technology products. Its response was to push for copying the US approach of imposing "flexible labour markets" so as to get longer working hours and more intensive production (in Marx's terms absolute and relative surplus value) and to try to cut back on welfare expenditure. This was the rationale behind "neoliberal" policies, with counter-reforms of welfare and the use of marketisation and privatisation measures to get workers competing with each other.

German capital followed a policy through the Bundesbank (and then the European Central Bank) in the 1990s of sacrificing economic growth to hold down wages (which rose cumulatively 10 percent less than the European average) and so increasing exports and the share of profits. The paradoxical outcome was that Germany had a big trade surplus and good profits, but a reduced share of world investment and production. This lay behind the pressure it applied successfully in the early 2000s to getting the then Social Democrat-Green government to push through counter-reforms in the Agenda 2010 Programme. Its main planks were a drastic reduction of unemployment benefits by a third, denying any benefits at all to 800,000 people, forcing the unemployed to accept jobs with below average pay, freezing pensions and charging for visits to doctors. Meanwhile, big firms threatened to move production to low wage sites in Eastern Europe if workers did not accept increased working hours. Such "internal modernisation", said Chancellor Schroeder, was "the prerequisite for Germany's assertion into global politics. "32 The overall result was that German real wages fell for the first time in half a century. The same logic lay behind the attempts of French governments to cut back on public sector pensions, to reduce the rights of young workers and to do away with the 35 hour week.

240

The New Age of Global Instability