奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

Digital Capitalism · 第 59 页

PDF 物理页索引 73 · DIGITAL CAPITALISM

书名
Digital Capitalism
作者
未记录
印刷页
59
PDF 物理页
73(从 0 开始)
章节
DIGITAL CAPITALISM
UUID
50b7f922-b940-4a05-8eb0-c4dc0d8ec9ed
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
be3901ce3c2cbb1cc2e6b9935df8e3a773a1944e81643f94301d173a3b398e4a

In a digital capitalist society, transnational digital corporations such as Uber, Deliveroo, Fiverr, or Upwork are the contemporary middlemen that exploit digital pieceworkers.

2.3.6 Facebook Labour

In the book The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, Engels (1892, 131–132) gives a definition of materialism:

According to the materialist conception, the determining factor in history is, in the last resort, the production and reproduction of immediate life. But this itself is again of a twofold character. On the one hand, the production of the means of subsistence, of food, clothing and shelter and the implements required for this; on the other, the production of human beings themselves, the propagation of the species.

Materialism in society is the insight that social production is the key factor of all societies and social realms. What Engels’s passage allows us to understand is that social production as the foundation of society is not limited to the office and the factory, but extends into all realms of society, including the family. Engels’s formulation has been influential on and led to discussions in Marxist and socialist feminism (e.g. Barrett 1980, 48–49, 131–132; Eisenstein 1979; Federici 2012, 1; Fraser and Jaeggi 2018, 32; Gimenez 1987; Haug 2015; Leacock 2008, 13–29; Notz 2020; Rowbotham 1973, 47; Sayers, Evans and Redclift 1987; Vogel 1996).

Although there is besides agreement lots of criticism of Engels’s formulation, its importance lies in the stress that reproductive labour such as housework is a very important aspect of capitalism. It allows a focus on the economic dimension of the household where labour-power is reproduced. Rejecting interpretations that Engels separates gender oppression from class, Martha Gimenez (1987) argues that Engels’s formulation should be interpreted dialectically. “Dialectically, that is the meaning of Engels’s term, ‘twofold’. To speak of the twofold nature of production is to refer, at the metatheoretical level, to its fundamental moments or aspects” (Gimenez 1987, 40). Gimenez argues that Engels stresses that class and gender oppression have different and united dynamics that are interacting, interconnected and entangled through (re) production and labour.

Chapter Two | Friedrich Engels in Digital Capitalism

59

The Digital Condition of the Working Class Today