奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age The Spirit of Networks · 第 117 页

PDF 物理页索引 120 · Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age

书名
Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age The Spirit of Networks
作者
未记录
印刷页
117
PDF 物理页
120(从 0 开始)
章节
Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age
UUID
8a3d8546-8fbb-485e-b423-37bc08c3284a
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
50662cc3238e853372dfada41a7b160c9c0e72fd8b3201ea70403fd5ab097282

The term “crowdsourcing” is a play on the more familiar term “outsourcing.” The first article heralds “The Rise of Crowdsourcing” (Howe 2006), and the subtitle reads, “Remember outsourcing? Sending jobs to India and China is so 2003. The new pool of cheap labor: everyday people using their spare cycles to create content, solve problems, even do corporate R&D” (Howe 2006).

Thus, the article anchors the rationale of network production in the ability to tap into a “pool of cheap labor” and mobilize it for one’s production needs. This statement makes a distinction between outsourcing and crowdsourcing but at the same time uncovers how similar they are: in outsourcing, cheap labor is based on differentials in space; with crowdsourcing, cheap labor is based on differentials in time. The new source of cheap labor, this statement suggests, is predicated and conditioned on time that is deemed unproductive—“spare cycles” in the language of the article—that is, time that is not easily translatable to money and capital.

But what is the mechanism, or “trick,” by which productive forces, harnessed for the project of capital accumulation, can nevertheless be conceived as unproductive (as “spare cycles”) and hence be partially or wholly unpaid? Presumably the trick is technological—this is made possible by network technology. But the trick is also discursive: the trick is that this labor is construed in the digital discourse to be done by “everyday people,” rather than by professional, tenured, “in-house” workers. In other words, it is labor done by amateurs during their free time as an expression of personal interest and passion, not labor done by professionals as an expression of the more mundane attempt to make a living. No wonder that the teaser for the article on the front cover of Wired proclaims, “Crowdsourcing: A billion amateurs want your job” (Cover 2006, emphasis mine). The threat is clear: one’s position in the work force is threatened not so much by other workers but by a new class of workers: a new reserve army of (this time around) amateurs.

Network Production

117