奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age The Spirit of Networks · 第 156 页

PDF 物理页索引 158 · Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age

书名
Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age The Spirit of Networks
作者
未记录
印刷页
156
PDF 物理页
158(从 0 开始)
章节
Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age
UUID
8a3d8546-8fbb-485e-b423-37bc08c3284a
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
86d335a9894894350ae0c5cde7d532e51cb382c28b7227791d4971540f164e0b

It is worthwhile at this point to pause and emphasize the full significance of this likening of humans to machines. In the digital discourse, this likening is merely a prelude to a much more profound claim: that humans and network technology are commensurable to such a degree that they can merge into unity. This likening should not be underplayed as merely metaphorical; rather, it is substantive and, hence, instructive of the horizons opened up by such a discourse. Consider a more common metaphor: “time is money.” To treat this maxim—immortalized in eighteenth-century America by Benjamin Franklin—strictly as a metaphor implies that time has similar characteristics to money in that both are quantifiable, malleable to manipulation (such as loss or accumulation), dear, finite, and so forth. As a metaphor, “time is money” imbues time with a very particular set of meanings (associated with capitalism) rather than alternative sets of meanings.

But that maxim carries an even heavier cultural significance. Once time is shown to be commensurable with money, once proper practices are introduced by which time can really be translated into money, then this can no longer be treated as a mere literary metaphor; rather, it becomes an instrumental and practical equation. Thus, for example, time becomes money (i.e., it can be translated into money) in the most pragmatic and instrumental sense under the specific conditions of capitalism, which, as both Marx and Weber pointed out, is conditioned by the emergence of wage-labor. As Marx has shown, time becomes particularly crucial under capitalism, where value that can be diverted to capital accumulation rather than reproduction comes from the difference between the total hours of work and the hours needed to create the value required for their own reproduction—that is, their wages. Marx calls this difference surplus value. This “trick”—translating the laborer’s (work)time into the capitalist’s capital—is only possible with the commodification of labor—that is, with the creation of wage laborers who are compensated for their time and not for the market value they actually produce.

156

Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age