So, after the rise o f MILITARY DETER-RENCE and its fall at the end o f the cold war, it would seem that the 'cold panic' of a world overexposed to maj or risks is beginning to be felt. These risks incl ude not only blind terrorism but also ecology and, especially, a tyrannical political economics, with the temptation, for certain fans of 'personal space', of launching what would this time amount to CIVIL DETERRENCE. lhe governance of public fear would then shift from the battlefield of the past to the marketplace. In other words, to an everyday life that will soon be made impossible, ravaged as i t is by the 'domestic terror' of each and every instant; the excess speed of the dashing tasks to be performed taking over from the crashes once involved in road accidents.
Isn't there already talk, here and there, of the future requirements for a SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY that will best ensure sustainable development? Big fans of management through stress, certain CEOs even claim that 'we can no longer let immobility set in', suggesting that the 'TIME TO MOVE' doctrine should be imposed throughout the globalized business firm. Everywhere you look, the 'broadband' of telecommunications is contaminating the use to which we put the week, its mode d'emploi, with the elimination of Sunday as a day-of followed by the elimination of the daily interruption of l unch. Imposition of the JUST-IN-TIME continuous day anticipates the inertia of the fatal instant and the unstoppable ofensive of the NANOCHRONOLOGIES, along the lines of the 'lightning crash' of 6 May 2010, when the wall ofW all Street suddenly crashed into the wall of money, the MONEY BARRIER, at precisely 2 . 2 5 pm.
THE GREAT ACCELERATOR
62