<sup>98</sup> Sartre, CDR 1, 82. 98 Sartre CDR 1. 82
<sup>97</sup> As Tombazos shows, Marx’s understanding of the difference between simple circulation and the circulation of money-capital is indebted to the transition from chemism to teleology in Hegel’s Logic. See Tombazos, Time in Marx, 75-9. Unlike the chemical process (simple circulation), the teleological process (capital) not only presupposes but posits the moments of its self-renewal.
<sup>99</sup> Ibid. 235.
<sup>100</sup> Marx’s concept of capital could well be understood as a dialectic of mortality (in both its existential and chronological registers) and immortality, inasmuch as ‘the immortality which money strove to achieve by setting itself negatively against circulation, by withdrawing from it, is achieved by capital, which preserves itself precisely by abandoning itself to circulation’, and ‘value is capital only as selfimmortalising and self-multiplying value.’ Marx, Grundrisse, 261, 639.
<sup>101</sup> Osborne, ‘Marx and the philosophy of time’, 20.
119