奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

State Platform Capitalism · 第 11 页

PDF 物理页索引 16 · Cambridge Elements

书名
State Platform Capitalism
作者
未记录
印刷页
11
PDF 物理页
16(从 0 开始)
章节
Cambridge Elements
UUID
d06b946b-6924-4f30-afbd-92f915edbae4
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
602eaa129b8d99ccd9703f1714c6ba6e8db79be569088bb457d8e665f8d538f4

In this Element, we seek conceptual clarity by drawing on advances made by the literature on the ‘new state capitalism’ (Alami and Dixon, 2024). Much writing broadly conceived ofthe neoliberal period as a ‘retreat ofthe state’ from governing the economy (Konings, 2010). This conceptualization understood economies to existent on a spectrum between ‘liberal’ and ‘coordinated’ market economies – with commentators treating those not fitting the ideal types as state capitalist aberrations, limited to a handful of middle-income and developing economies like Russia, Turkey, and China (e.g., Bremmer, 2009). Such work ignored the considerable support (both financial and in terms of coordination) states offered to their firms right through the neoliberal period (Alami and Dixon, 2020b). It also offered a poor means by which to grasp how or why a dramatic expansion of highly visible and direct statist interventions have proliferated on a global scale – across virtually all varieties of capitalist economy.

By contrast, following Alami and Dixon (2024), we conceptualize state capitalism not as an ideal type or a variety ofcapitalism, but as a set ofprocesses and relationships by which states seek to actively support the process of capital accumulation. Understood in this way, state capitalism is conceived as a perennial feature of real capitalist economies – but also that as a set of practices, it is potentially subject to transformation, evolution, and increases (or decreases) in scale and scope over time. There is indeed both continuity and innovation in contemporary state capitalist practices (Musacchio et al., 2015). They range from what Alami and Dixon (2021, 765) identify as ‘state-capital hybrids’ like sovereign wealth firms, state-owned (or backed) firms and policy banks; to the ‘muscular statism’ of industrial and innovation policies, capital controls, and development and planning strategies. And while many interventions are underpinned by economic nationalism, the new state capitalism is simultaneously transnational in character. Far from acting in ways which fragment the globalized economy, sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) and stateowned enterprises (SOEs) are major drivers of transnational economic integration as they pursue expansive overseas investments (Babić et al., 2022).

Understood in this way, it is clear that state capitalist practices have dramatically increased in both scale and scope over the past decade and a half. What drove the emergence of the new state capitalism? The global financial crisis of

State Platform Capitalism

11