奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

Curation in the Age of Platform Capitalism The Value of Selection, Narration, and Expertise in New Media Cultures · 第 58 页

PDF 物理页索引 68 · CURATION IN THE AGE OF PLATFORM CAPITALISM

书名
Curation in the Age of Platform Capitalism The Value of Selection, Narration, and Expertise in New Media Cultures
作者
未记录
印刷页
58
PDF 物理页
68(从 0 开始)
章节
CURATION IN THE AGE OF PLATFORM CAPITALISM
UUID
d1c31cd8-6afd-4ea5-b7b0-085c26a4e406
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
4bb2b4f340c0177d7fc4cff87e55636fd52bb27341afddc60fdec95e4a8ccac9

As a business model, the platform has a single mission: to make sure that users “participate regularly and often” and eventually “stick around on their own accord” (Choudary, 2015: 43). A platform should continuously increase its trafic and interactions so that users feel compelled to return to it, so that the platform becomes a habit, or to use more clinical terms, it becomes a dependency and addiction. Yet this would require eliciting new user behaviors that “had never existed in the past”, that is, behaviors consistent with adapting a new habit; as such, the platform, should not only “invest in behavior design” but, as if in a sort of disciplinary-pedagogical mission, to “constantly reward desirable actions and discourage undesirable ones” (Choudary, 2015: 43). Here, the business literature acknowledges that the most important mission of the platform is to intervene in the behavioral matrix of users so that it creates the conditions for exploiting their time and attention.

This does not mean that all platform interactions are determined by platform design, but, in the capitalist relations of production, the platforms are first and foremost profit-making enterprises which direct user activity accordingly. Speaking of a sharing economy and collaborative production— rather than behavioral design, addiction, precarity, the gig economy and new forms of exploitation and accumulation—obscures from a critical political economic perspective the role of platforms as a fundamentally new actor in the determination of digital interaction. In this regard, the notion of platform capitalism, which I employ here is a “techno-pessimist term”, which challenges the positivism characterizing the vocabulary of business (and often media) studies, that is, the idea of the internet as inherently collaborative (Langley and Leyshon 2017). An internet taken over by platforms is nothing of the sort; it is in the vital interest of the platforms to suppress noncommodified forms of collaboration from which they cannot profit.

58

Homo Curatorius