{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787513647939","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","uuid":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","normalized_title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787513647939","isbns":["9787513647939"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":221,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%80%BB%E4%BD%93%E7%BB%A9%E6%95%88%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%96%B0%E7%B2%BE%E7%A5%9E","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":108,"pdf_page":117,"physical_index":117,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2d4a541ef2bf2d9f7e2d323d00d3a6805ef09776abc65873d86ae1372487883a"},"chapter":"第四章“现代化”国家的绩效","content":"一、公共政策的“评估”或公共服务的“测算”？\n\n公共政策评估与公共服务的测算之间的关系是模糊的，虽然被记录在不同的历史文献中，这二者各自占据的空间却越来越大。无论是把国家看作单纯的服务提供者，还是公众利益的保障者，公共政策评估向追求服务绩效的转变，从量化关系的角度看都是非常重要的。前者的情况是，公共政策评估以人为评议的社会构建形式，在必要的时候以利益相关者共同达成的最终数据作为支撑。后者的情况是，公共服务的测算被当作是非常务实的做法，人们想当然地认为，被测算的对象毫无疑问是真实存在的。\n\n(一)减弱的封闭性\n\nPatrick Viveret 和 Bernard Perret（1989) 再次提到，当人们进行“评估”时，无论对经济活动价值做出的判断是高是低，这种判断的结果都成了关注焦点。帕特里克·蔚五海（Patrick Viveret)认为，做出这种判断的目的是在民主概念和决策效率之间建立一种压力，这里的民主概念是指价值应当是由集体评议并且是共享的；而决策效率指的是评议应当产生效用。决定这二者的优先顺序的情况可以说是非常建构主义的，“不能忽视测算的结果很大程度上依靠测算程序本身”(Desrosières,1993)。然而，从多年前开始，大部分的评估方法都转向了计量学领域（Vlassopoulou，2005)①，它们实际上是一种虚幻的现实主义做法。\n\n总体绩效：资本主义新精神\n\n108","previous_page":107,"next_page":109}