{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787513647939","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","uuid":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","normalized_title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787513647939","isbns":["9787513647939"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":221,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%80%BB%E4%BD%93%E7%BB%A9%E6%95%88%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%96%B0%E7%B2%BE%E7%A5%9E","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":118,"pdf_page":127,"physical_index":127,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e8e16112bc95cdf5d7f5b83771a1ea54a6e097a1c2a574900d5f06e72a810f3c"},"chapter":"第四章“现代化”国家的绩效","content":"2.第二个浪潮：罗卡尔主义式评估\n\n在计划总署的作用减弱、经济计划衰退的背景下，出现了一种事后评估机制。它由社会党总理米歇尔·罗卡尔提出，具体体现在1989年帕特里克·蔚五梅的报告①中，代表的是一种“更新公共服务”的意愿。这里的“更新”总结性地表达了改革工作关系、改善与用户关系、建设公务员“责任”的意愿。评估和管控的新任务被交给了议会，其主导地位要高于技术官僚和专家。②但改革的各种目标具有很大差异，包括弥补国民议会缺乏决策明度(unecarencedans l’éclarage des décision)的不足，控制公共开支，在更加民主的基础上做出更合理的决策；其中最大的问题是要求议会“用经济学术语进行公共政策的评估，（制宪议会）赋予议会监测法律执行情况的权力，并评估政策的结果，明确造成的影响”。①这种评估公共政策的浪潮很大程度上为新公共管理(newpublicmanagement)奠定了基础。\n\n总体绩效：资本主义新精神\n\n①但他的报告不全属于同样的认识论。Deleau等人(1986)的报告则更加现实。在这份报告中，“对某项公共政策的评估就是通过运用一种识别(评估)、测算（主要是量化指标)、对照(与被观测情形以外的其他情形比较)和解释(因果关系）的措施要认识和测算它的独立影响”。\n\n②对于特殊专业的公共政策评估可能需要审计院的协助。\n\n118","previous_page":117,"next_page":119}