{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787513647939","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","uuid":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","normalized_title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787513647939","isbns":["9787513647939"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":221,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%80%BB%E4%BD%93%E7%BB%A9%E6%95%88%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%96%B0%E7%B2%BE%E7%A5%9E","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":38,"pdf_page":47,"physical_index":47,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"39c86f6eda456c160d7084cd6ced3066239ea16f04fcbb62d2fe401299fbd53b"},"chapter":"第一章 绩效及其词源","content":"它的出处无所考察，似乎自身就可以构建某一真实存在的事实。这与公共统计数据完全相反。公共统计数据的出处都是由它们的产出机构所保障的（Desrosières，1993），这些机构同时也是这些数据完整性的担保人—使用绩效评定指数的社会政治条件却鲜少被公众所熟识，也几乎没有人质疑这些状态，争论也就更不存在了。\n\n与其他重要而有用的知识形式的标准不同，绩效指数一出现便被视为一份被确认的协议。似乎只要人们公布一个用来量化社会现实的数据，这份协议就会立即指向某一已经被接受的知识，而且该知识已经被清楚明白地阐述过了。\n\n但是，可见性只是流通中某一可能存在的环节。希瑞尔·勒缪（CyrilLemieux)于2007年曾经说道，正是由于可见性发挥了作用，我们才能建立起真正的流通领域的社会学。我们感兴趣的是，流通可能会使评定标准受到争议，质疑它的稳定性，更甚者会摧毁它虚假的价值中立态度。在社会科学层面，在一些社会政治情况下，社会现实会被量化，这些情况的可见性并不会把量化的工作变得无效，但会把思考的方向引向预先设定的评估机制中，多种选择从源头上就已经可以自圆其说。同样的道理，绩效指数也完全可以这样自圆其说。\n\n总体绩效：资本主义新精神\n\n38","previous_page":37,"next_page":39}