{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787513647939","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","id":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","uuid":"01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","normalized_title":"总体绩效资本主义新精神","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787513647939","isbns":["9787513647939"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":221,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%80%BB%E4%BD%93%E7%BB%A9%E6%95%88%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%96%B0%E7%B2%BE%E7%A5%9E","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/01d9787f-4c57-445a-9e15-ce10dae3b33e/search"},"page":{"printed_page":66,"pdf_page":75,"physical_index":75,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5279785217091e3920d677f009dc3a6c5afd1fcf5ef93c823d75a711ab18a926"},"chapter":"第二章服务业经济的绩效","content":"的差异”（Boyer,2001)。\n\n3. 外源性的解释\n\n尽管第二种解释确实很有趣，但这一派的多样化解释并没有考虑到服务业的特殊性。“外源性的解释”这个论点的奠基人是让·盖德雷(Gadrey，1996)。在他关注的核心一是第三产业的特殊性，二是将福特主义开展的认知制度纳入考量范围，以便研究某些种类的服务业经济活动。在他的研究中，让·盖德雷表明生产力是一个概念，一个由历史确定的调节制度，在第三产业中生产率的增长放缓完全是可解释的。国民账户的测量工具同宏观经济分析的工具一样，仍然依赖于一种专门的理论架构。对于这一点，我们已经从威廉·鲍莫尔、计量经济学家阿曼汀·施莱伯(Amandine Schreiber) 和奥古斯丁·维卡(Augustin Vicard)的研究中看到了。尽管他们主要探讨的都是对服务业生产力的分析，这几位经济学家都没有考察过概念问题，更没有考虑生产力的测量。同样，制度经济学也没有脱离将福特时代的工具作为解释核心的分析理论，这些工具在当时的体制下是合适的。在这一领域，更深入的研究需要从价值上和量上考察服务业的产品内容，更普遍地说，就是要考察“财富”的内容。\n\n总体绩效：资本主义新精神\n\n66","previous_page":65,"next_page":67}