{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"021891ed-c649-4b38-aee1-9249a053f447","title":"倦怠社会","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787521704693","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"021891ed-c649-4b38-aee1-9249a053f447","id":"021891ed-c649-4b38-aee1-9249a053f447","uuid":"021891ed-c649-4b38-aee1-9249a053f447","title":"倦怠社会","normalized_title":"倦怠社会","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787521704693","isbns":["9787521704693","0120192519"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":118,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/021891ed-c649-4b38-aee1-9249a053f447","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%80%A6%E6%80%A0%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/021891ed-c649-4b38-aee1-9249a053f447/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/021891ed-c649-4b38-aee1-9249a053f447/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/021891ed-c649-4b38-aee1-9249a053f447","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/021891ed-c649-4b38-aee1-9249a053f447/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/021891ed-c649-4b38-aee1-9249a053f447/search"},"page":{"printed_page":76,"pdf_page":81,"physical_index":81,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"00d4e45759a470fad4f8df773cbbc91b3a3e94253bafc4660100a6ff5a9d97ed"},"chapter":"Müdigkeitsgesellschaft","content":"阿兰·埃亨伯格认为，抑郁和抑郁症之间仅仅存在量的差别。抑郁曾经只属于少数精英，被民主化为如今的抑郁症：“如果说抑郁曾经是一个独特群体的属性，那么抑郁症则显示这种独特性已然变得大众化。”[12]抑郁症是一种“平等化的抑郁，是民主社会的典型疾病”。埃亨伯格认为，在这样一个时代中，尼采曾预言过的自主的人(der souveräneMensch)大量出现，抑郁症便是这一时代的产物。按照这种观点，抑郁症患者因为其自主性而精疲力竭，他没有力量做自己的主人。由于持续不断地追求主动性，他变得疲惫不堪。埃亨伯格提出的抑郁症病原学理论陷入了一个悖论，因为抑郁概念形成于古代，当时尚不存在疲倦的功绩主体。一个古代的抑郁者完全不同于抑郁症患者，后者没有能力“做自己的主人”，亦缺少“成为自己的激情”[13]。\n\n倦怠社会\n\n76","previous_page":75,"next_page":77}