{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"04497cac-13ed-405b-bf60-31d9a915217d","title":"日常生活批判 第三卷","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520108911","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"04497cac-13ed-405b-bf60-31d9a915217d","id":"04497cac-13ed-405b-bf60-31d9a915217d","uuid":"04497cac-13ed-405b-bf60-31d9a915217d","title":"日常生活批判 第三卷","normalized_title":"日常生活批判第三卷","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787520108911","isbns":["9787520108911"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":155,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/04497cac-13ed-405b-bf60-31d9a915217d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%97%A5%E5%B8%B8%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4%20%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%89%E5%8D%B7","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/04497cac-13ed-405b-bf60-31d9a915217d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/04497cac-13ed-405b-bf60-31d9a915217d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/04497cac-13ed-405b-bf60-31d9a915217d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/04497cac-13ed-405b-bf60-31d9a915217d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/04497cac-13ed-405b-bf60-31d9a915217d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":663,"pdf_page":125,"physical_index":125,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"be9d565a2b2308fd9a09066dd75e009a0cbe12f739b478f11e5f40b6eb6020e4"},"chapter":"第二章 不连续性","content":"这些理论家不认为他们正在解释技术，而认为他们正在客观地估计技术。他们拒绝承认，他们正在提出或呈现一个有倾向性的政治计划。对于他们来讲，这种计划似乎逻辑地遵循着技术。一种选择，一种决策，是技术化社会和政治，还是相反，是社会化和政治化技术呢？把自己表达为客观的政治立场意味着什么？这样提问不能解决问题，却排除了通过扭曲问题、掩盖矛盾而形成问题的解决办法。\n\n夸耀这个技术观点的人，承认基本单元、微观社会和微观决策的空间和功能，换句话说，他们承认日常生活的空间和功能。他们同时考虑日常生活，也排除日常生活。信息技术可以减少知识和本能。从这个角度讲，认识不再涉及使用概念，只要接受信息和记忆信息就够了。认识概念和为了得到知识而依靠的概念，都是模糊不清的。对于所有的意图和目的来讲，在面对事实时，概念耗散了。一个古老的哲学争论就这样专横地得到了解决和被取消了。\n\n但是，信息丢失了。如果不通过计划和关于知识的观念，我们如何阻止信息的耗散呢？例如，确认同一性：它声称它继续存在，它的韧性，它抵制衰退和抵制变得不同。这样，同一性就变成了抽象的、理想的、非现\n\n第二章 不连续性\n\n① Simon Nora and Alain Minc, The Computerization of Society: A Report to the President of France, MIT Press, London 1980.\n\n663","previous_page":662,"next_page":664}