{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家-形式的批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787560449197","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","uuid":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家-形式的批判","normalized_title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家形式的批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787560449197","isbns":["9787560449197"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":548,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8B%84%E4%BF%84%E5%B0%BC%E7%B4%A2%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E5%AF%B9%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6-%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"182 / 116","pdf_page":197,"physical_index":197,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ab6a3ea18f16d8e4b95ba8adaf837ed6ea471d2c150c5eb505f33f88e0989dd5"},"chapter":"第二章","content":"这对劳动权利在后来要经历的阶段同样适用：在这些阶段中，劳工集体订立契约的原则成为根本性的，而劳动的民主则得到想象和接近。这里具体劳动所产生出的否定被塑造为集体性和一般性的。它首先以工团主义的形式得到组织，其次以政治的形式得到组织，并且将其有效的颠覆从有限的环境传播到对整个社会的规划中。从权利和权力的角度来看，如其所是地认识否定必须意味着对其肯定性地进行重估，并且将其置于一定位置，从而让其在积累过程中肯定性地发挥作用。否定性在肯定性中得到重估，作为发展的积极要素被萝卜和大棒驱使去行动。①这种重估只能由国家来进行，即在一般化的结构层次上进行，这种一般化的程度需要能将对抗的一般性包含在自身内。\n\n182\n\n狄俄尼索斯的劳动：对国家一形式的批判\n\n116\n\n①并非巧合的是，有作者认识到，正是劳动权利形成的历史运动后来被包纳进宪法中，成为劳动的法律规训的分散但是有所关联的环节。意大利宪法或许在这方面是具有代表性的。见莫塔蒂《宪法中的劳动》，第160页及其后，第180页及其后，以及吉尔尼尼《劳动的宪法意义》。","previous_page":196,"next_page":198}