{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家-形式的批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787560449197","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","uuid":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家-形式的批判","normalized_title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家形式的批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787560449197","isbns":["9787560449197"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":548,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8B%84%E4%BF%84%E5%B0%BC%E7%B4%A2%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E5%AF%B9%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6-%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":251,"pdf_page":266,"physical_index":266,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0e37f64d450445cadaaaf8fb75dd21e5f9d737c85821737195bacd33834adb12"},"chapter":"第二章","content":"有了这些关于危机理论的初步论述，对国家进行分析的结构框架无疑在让生产出的意象具有辩证动力的方向上，前进了一大步。尽管如此，这足以决定阶级在危机和国家中的有效本性吗？这个问题会引起激烈反应，因为试图在制度和社会学方面终结危机理论的尝试会在同一领域中展开(例如可见哈贝马斯，《正当性危机》[Legitimation Crisis])。另一方面，奥菲的论述只是代表了提出危机理论的努力过程中的一个阶段—只不过从阶级视角来看更具有融贯性，这不也是实情吗？\n\n第四章 共产主义国家理论\n\n251\n\n163","previous_page":250,"next_page":252}