{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家-形式的批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787560449197","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","uuid":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家-形式的批判","normalized_title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家形式的批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787560449197","isbns":["9787560449197"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":548,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8B%84%E4%BF%84%E5%B0%BC%E7%B4%A2%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E5%AF%B9%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6-%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":280,"pdf_page":295,"physical_index":295,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"16fc4fd9ddcf40d37f788c5afb1f06bf27d524e4faf0f42a7c305dbbbf4bae70"},"chapter":"第二章","content":"于是，处理国家一公共支出问题意味着从最开始就消灭任何简化，这些简化可能以各种各样的方式将我们引向“国家垄断资本主义”所特有的客观主义；也意味着以确定的方式去假设:在面对无产阶级在社会上的出场时，国家既是资本主义发展所遭遇的根本性矛盾的场域，也是其主体；最后，还意味着认识到，危机的机制源于(用马克思主义的术语来说)构成资本的关系—即处于斗争中的两个阶级的关系—的“爆破”(如马克思所言)。最后，马克思解释说，一切都取决于必要劳动和剩余价值之间的比例，或者说，围绕着剥削及其比例问题的对象化劳动与活劳动的不同环节(《大纲》，第359-364页)。公共支出是一种公共和国家形式，在这种形式中，国家对生产性劳动的工人社会的剥削关系被神秘化了。公共支出是一种社会工资，而工人阶级的分析和\n\n280\n\n狄俄尼索斯的劳动：对国家一形式的批判\n\n①雅非(David Yaffe)接受曼奈尔(Manel)作品中的观点，并作出了这个论断。见《盈利能力的危机》(“TheCrisisof Profitability”)和《马克思主义关于危机、资本和国家的理论》(“TheMarxian Theory of Crisis，Capital andState”)。约阿希姆·赫施似乎也陷入这种含混性中。见他的《对政治体制的分析》(“Zur Analyse des politischen Systems”)，特别是第 95,97 页。然而赫施的作品代表了一项了不起的贡献，推进了马克思主义的国家理论，我们会在后面进行更为详细的考察。","previous_page":279,"next_page":null}