{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家-形式的批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787560449197","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","id":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","uuid":"04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家-形式的批判","normalized_title":"狄俄尼索斯的劳动对国家形式的批判","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787560449197","isbns":["9787560449197"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":548,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%8B%84%E4%BF%84%E5%B0%BC%E7%B4%A2%E6%96%AF%E7%9A%84%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E5%AF%B9%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6-%E5%BD%A2%E5%BC%8F%E7%9A%84%E6%89%B9%E5%88%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/04558c0a-f186-4087-aaf5-40763c71d1e7/search"},"page":{"printed_page":463,"pdf_page":478,"physical_index":478,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0bf57a9cb710aeb90ddf24e1862877e76eb3b9b64b08c2a00fbee2ed7ab424ba"},"chapter":"第二章","content":"第七章 创构力量的潜能\n\n463\n\n①反击犬儒主义的“罪名”，证明解构主义关于正义与社会变革也有积极的内容,这是在卡多佐法学院(Cardozo School of Law)所举行的会议的存在理由，论文集以《解构与正义的可能》(Deconstruction and the Possibility of Jus-tice)为题出版，由杜希拉·康内尔(Drucilla Cornell)、迈克尔·罗森菲尔德(Michel Rosenfeld) 和戴维·卡尔森(David Gray Carlson)主编。见主编的序言，第ix-x页;以及康内尔的论文《界限的哲学：系统理论和女性主义法律改革》(“The Philosophy of the Limit: SystemsTheoryand Feminist Legal Re-form”)，特别是第69-70页。关于正义是解构筹划的核心，即“解构即正义”这一论断，见康内尔，《界限的哲学》，第132页及其后。尽管迈克尔·瑞恩的方法与康内尔截然不同，但他也认为解构主义的法学研究推进了实质或者现实正义的计划，“隐含在对法律所进行的解构性批判中的，是一种另类的法律制度，该制度—跟随无法再被理想的替代物所限制的参考—必须成为另类的经济和社会制度”(《政治与文化》，第198页)。\n\n②对批判法学研究破坏其自身批判前提的批评，见费什，《顺其自然》，第266,496-497页。","previous_page":462,"next_page":null}