{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":116,"pdf_page":156,"physical_index":156,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"49e39e9b6611a18be7f22a5334f05786ab06a5f3112da7da52361056391857b7"},"chapter":"第二章","content":"联网碎片化的逻辑。\n\n平台正在成为领地。除了垄断原始数据来源的地域逻辑之外，数字服务中固有的反馈循环也为主体创造了一种依赖性。这不仅因为以观察我们的实践为基础的算法正在成为平常生存不可或缺的生产资料，还因为个人在平台上的注册因界面的个性化和较高的退出成本而产生了锁定效应，这种效应产生了永久性。①\n\n最终，平台组织的数字领域被分割成相对独立的、相互竞争的基础设施。谁控制了这些基础设施，谁就集中了对参与其中的人的政治和经济支配权。算法治理特有的监控逻辑的另一面，就是主体对“数字土地”的依恋。\n\n虚幻的自主权\n\n在算法管理时代，移动平台与劳动者之间的关联性质问题引发了有关雇佣关系的重大争议。优步的案例是这方面的典型例子。截至2018年12月31日，在该平台上注册的390万名司机面临着一个反复出现的问题。他们是如优步所称，与优步自由签约的自雇工人，还是应该被视为平台的雇员，并因此享受受薪就业提供的保护？\n\n从法律角度来看，答案仍不确定，尤其这个问题因地方和国家背景的不同而有不同的表述。例如，2019年，加州立法机构做出了支持第二种解释的裁决，指出平台工人是雇员，因此平台必须承担其作为雇主在社会保障、失业保险、工资税收、工人赔偿范围和遵守最低工资规定方面的责任。在瑞士，联邦法院于2023年2月确认司机与优步之间存在雇佣关系，并责令该公司缴纳社会保险费。①\n\n技术封建主义\n\n① Adam CANDEUB, «Behavioral economics, Internet search, and antitrust», I/ S. A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, vol. 9, 2014, p. 409.\n\n116","previous_page":115,"next_page":117}