{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":118,"pdf_page":158,"physical_index":158,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"56a292f9dccc55af4359b6f33ffa8aa8cb146b2c6b14354418805969c5af8be7"},"chapter":"第二章","content":"这种合同安排的理由基于一个主要论点自主权。司机使用自己的车辆，选择工作日和时间，并保留随时切换到另一个平台的选择。不可否认，这种灵活性构成了这种关系的重要方面，这一点从对相关人员进行的调查中确实可以看出。纽约的一位优步司机总结道：“你是你自己的老板。如果你愿意，你就工作；如果你不愿意，你就待在家里。这取决于你。”②为了强调这一点，包括为优步工作的经济学家在内的研究人员进行了实证建模，以量化这种灵活性的价值，他们估计这种灵活性的价值占司机收入的40%。③在优步和零工经济（gig economy）模式的狂热者看来，这种灵活性及其为司机带来的机会意味着不存在隶属关系，而且通过互惠，雇佣关系也具有非工资性质。\n\n尽管这种隶属关系问题产生的原因与传统雇佣关系情况下并不完全相同，但从信息系统和法律分析的角度来看，工人与平台之间的关系显然建立在一种根本的不对称的基础上。\n\n技术封建主义\n\n① 在首次公开募股的相关文件中，优步承认了司机对低薪酬的不满，并预计这种不满情绪将会增加：“我们的目标是提供与零售、批发、餐饮或类似行业相当的收入机会，但仍有相当数量的司机对我们的平台感到不满。由于我们计划减少司机激励措施以改善财务业绩，我们预计他们的不满情绪将会增加。”参见：«Uber technologies，inc.，form s-1-Registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933», United States Securitiesand Exchange Commission, 11 avril 2019, p. 30。\n\n② Mareike MÖHLMANN et Lior ZALMANSON, «Hands on the wheel: navigating algorithmic management and Uber drivers' autonomy», International Conference On Information (ICIS), Association for Information System, 2017, p. 7.\n\n③ M Keith CHEN, Judith A. CHEVALIER, Peter E. ROSSI et Emily OEHLSEN, «The value of flexible work: evidence from Uber drivers», Journal of Political Economy, vol. 127, n°6, 2019, p. 2735-2794.\n\n118","previous_page":117,"next_page":119}