{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":145,"pdf_page":185,"physical_index":185,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"2f09586f453b1e73af1a6284306addfc3593fec7ec630193fb68de2c708d21fe"},"chapter":"第三章","content":"您必须向亚马逊或谷歌付费才能随时随地工作。\n\n她推荐的结构（所谓的“零工经济”）回溯到一种早于强盗资本主义的经济结构。在那个体系中，不同级别的仆人和工人为特权买单，他们一无所有，在一个完全由个人或实体控制的地盘上工作，而这个人或实体对居民拥有绝对的权力，几乎不对任何人负责。\n\n当然，我们说的是封建主义。技术正在把我们带入一个新的封建时代，在这个时代，个人必须提供robota（一个捷克语词汇，意为苦役、免费劳动，恰好是“机器人”一词的词根)，以维持对大科技平台的有效访问，而在人们的生活中越来越多的事情都需通过这个平台完成。这一论断有充分的理由。①\n\n这种指责直截了当，它混合了两种声音。第一种声音是新一代的反垄断论点，年轻律师莉娜·汗（LinaKhan）和所谓的反垄断嬉皮士（参见本书“附录二”）将这些论点推向了前台。第二种声音是上文讨论的、基于数据提取和利用问题对大科技的批判。但最重要的是，它勾勒出了一条值得进一步探究的途径，也就是新经济自相矛盾的封建未来一—我称之为技术封建主义假说。\n\n第三章 无形资产的食利者\n\n① Alexandra SCAGGS, « The node to serfdom », Financial Times, Alphaville (blog), 2018.\n\n145","previous_page":144,"next_page":146}