{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":168,"pdf_page":208,"physical_index":208,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"744ab6d2b74152eacb73e2595803d271fe7c077133103388e28a19507d334d2c"},"chapter":"第四章","content":"生产力动态。第五个也是最后一个层面涉及前四个坐标结合之后的生产力动态。\n\n与资本主义不同，在奴隶制和封建主义下，并不存在通过引进节省劳动力的技术来提高生产力的系统性趋势。这有几个原因。\n\n首先，如我们所见，在封建主义框架内，直接生产者的投资手段几乎为零。当工作主要受到武力压制时，他们就没有动力去合作改进生产过程。①\n\n第二个障碍是地主缺乏节约劳动力的动力。无论是封建地主还是奴隶主，他们都不给工人发工资，所以没有什么可节省的。②虽然“资本家可以而且确实通过从生产中驱逐劳动力，以应对价格下跌—要么减少生产，要么引入节省劳动力的机制”，但奴隶主无法在不冒资本损失风险的情况下处置他们的劳动力。因此，他们没有节约劳动力的动力，相反，他们会最大限度地使用劳动力。他们对价格下跌的反应是增加产量并增加奴隶的工作直到奴隶精疲力尽。这与封建领主尝试的方式相同，后者在产量下降时增加征税。通常，两者都不会投资节省劳动\n\n技术封建主义\n\n① 在这种结构中，“武力在影响工作的质量和规律性方面只能起到有限的作用，而更需要运用复杂和多样化的工具来进行管理”。参见：RobertBRENNER，«Theorigins of capitalist development: a critique of neo - Smithian Marxism» , New Left Review,vol. 1, n°104, 1977, p. 36。\n\n② 查尔斯·波斯特（Charles Post）以美国的奴隶种植园为背景分析了这一问题：“奴隶作为生产的恒定或固定要素进入生产过程，因此种植园主必须承担不灵活的成本，以确保劳动力的再生产。”参见：Charles POST，The American Road to Capitalism.Studies in Class : Structure, Economic Development and Political Conflict , 1620 –1877,Brill, Leyde, 2011, p. 146 – 147。\n\n168","previous_page":167,"next_page":169}