{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":177,"pdf_page":217,"physical_index":217,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"b0b3ddec42aead986d52dc5c3eb69c5fff3cda4c0ec7eb1ce7cfac5c916c9e53"},"chapter":"第四章","content":"在我看来，一旦我们认真对待地租问题，数字技术的政治经济学就变成了一种技术封建主义逻辑。如今，数字地租的概念非常普遍，甚至在新自由主义经济学家让·梯若尔（JeanTi-role）的著作中也可以找到它的影子。①\n\n尽管对劳动力的剥削在全球剩余价值的形成过程中仍然发挥着核心作用，但当前的特殊性在于资本利用捕获机制，从这个全球性的剩余价值总量中获利，同时又可以减少其对剥削的直接参与并脱离生产过程。这正是此处“地租”的含义。②\n\n资本主义的核心动力是与竞争相关的投资需求和对市场的广泛依赖。但无形资产的崛起正在颠覆这一传统逻辑。随着数字资产与其用户变得密不可分，个人和组织的流动性受到阻碍。\n\n第四章 技术封建主义假说\n\n① Jean TIROLE, Économie du bien commun, PUF, Paris, 2016, p. 526.\n\n② 经济学中的“地租”是一个经典概念，与不同的传统都有关系。大卫·哈维从马克思主义的角度提出了地租理论，参见：David HARVEY，The Limits to Capital，op. cit.，chapter XI。最近，迪潘卡尔·巴苏（Deepankar Basu）在《马克思的地租分析：理论、实例与应用》一文中对马克思的地租概念进行了系统性研究，参见：Deepankar BASU, «Marx's analysis of ground-rent: theory, examples and applications»,UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers, n° 241，2018。公共选择 (Public Choice)学派从一个截然不同的角度广泛使用了这一概念，参见：MatthewD. MITCHELL，«Rent seeking at 52: an introduction to a special issue of public choice», Public Choice ,vol. 181, n°1, 2019, p. 1 − 4。\n\n177","previous_page":176,"next_page":178}