{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":208,"pdf_page":248,"physical_index":248,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a929eecee9e8e9cd5b87a399c7be8179c0c2dfa3847448435978be3c164cd9fa"},"chapter":"第四章","content":"在这些作品中，莉娜·汗2017年在《耶鲁法学杂志》（YaleLawJournal）上发表的文章现在可供参考。汗是一名律师，曾在新美国基金会与巴里·林恩的团队共事，后在开放市场研究所（Open Market Institute）工作，之后就读于耶鲁大学。她的文章题为《亚马逊的反垄断悖论》（Amazon's antitrust paradox)，参考了罗伯特·博克（Robert Bork）于1978年出版的《反垄断悖论：自相矛盾的政策》（The Antitrust Paradox：A Policy atWar with Itself) —书。②\n\n博克抨击的悖论可以简述如下。美国的反垄断政策追求多重目标并针对模糊的统治思想，最终危害了主要目标效率。因此，他主张实施审慎的反垄断政策。只要竞争的力量仍然在起作用，即使是潜在的力量，就不要把统治问题当作一个问题。\n\n在汗看来，这个悖论完全不同。这都取决于具体案例。亚马逊的案例揭示了博克理论和芝加哥学派的局限性：\n\n随着20世纪70年代和80年代法律理论和实践的变化，反垄断法现在评估竞争的重点是消费者的短期利益，而不是生产者或整个市场的活力。从这一新的角度来看，低消费价格足以证明存在良性竞争。从这一标准的角度来看，亚马逊表现出色。亚马逊面向消费者的低价经营策略和言论使其得以逃脱政府的审查。亚马逊与反垄断机构最亲密的一次接触是在司法部起诉其他公司联合对抗亚马逊时。贝索斯仿佛是在摸清了反垄断法的底细之后，才想出了公司的发展道路，然后设计出顺利绕过这些法律的方法。亚马逊在唱响当代反垄断赞歌，为消费者争光的同时，也在向垄断迈进。①\n\n技术封建主义\n\n① David AUTOR et al., «Concentrating on the fall of the labor share», American Economic Review, vol. 107, n° 5, 2017, p. 180-185.\n\n② Robert H. BORK, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, Free Press/ Maxwell Macmillan, New York/Toronto, 1993.\n\n208","previous_page":207,"next_page":209}