{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":209,"pdf_page":249,"physical_index":249,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"8fdd88f4ba4a9d58e803190c35fe3575b787251b954220853bdc9b4862b74bea"},"chapter":"第四章","content":"汗的贡献具有启发性。一方面，她从过去两个世纪美国反垄断的理论和实践传统出发，深入探讨了芝加哥学派的理论以及反对该理论的论据。另一方面，她对亚马逊的反竞争行为进行了深入研究。她的结论毋庸置疑，亚马逊是一家规模庞大的公司，存在多种反竞争行为，却在法律的夹缝中悄然崛起。\n\n汗描述了许多亚马逊的行为，这些行为本应引起当局的反应。例如，亚马逊以低于成本的价格销售畅销书、Kindle电子阅读器或亚马逊Prime服务，使该公司能够在各个领域确立统治地位，并发挥互补性，从而加强网络效应。目前的反垄断理论无法看到亚马逊在何处以及如何设法抵消损失，而这正是滥用统治地位的特征。在图书板块，这种霸权的构建带来了风险，减少了消费产品的多样性。这种风险也是一种政治风险，因为图书行业的组织与思想的流通直接相关。①\n\n附录二反垄断嬉皮士与芝加哥学派\n\n① Lina M. KHAN, «Amazon's antitrust paradox», Yale Law Journal, vol. 126, n° 3, 2016, p. 716.\n\n209","previous_page":208,"next_page":210}