{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":211,"pdf_page":251,"physical_index":251,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e7c4a493ebf506735f9f0666a73d4347167baf076711147e08e72bf3b004827e"},"chapter":"第四章","content":"对消费者福利的过度关注是错误的。它暴露了国会颁布反垄断法的立法历史，国会颁布反垄断法的目的是促进包含工人、生产者、企业家和公民利益在内的多元政治经济目标。它还错误地取代了对市场过程及其结构的关注，不再关注市场力量是否充分分散以保持竞争，只考虑结果，也就是只考虑对消费者物质福利的影响。①\n\n在此，汗重申了美国反垄断的传统方法，也就是20世纪70年代以前的方法。这种方法通常被称为结构主义方法，重点在于市场结构，并将集中程度本身作为一项标准。它认为，竞争管理机构必须考虑多方利益，这些机构必须保护生产者、消费者、工人和公民免受滥用垄断权力之害。\n\n经济力量过度集中的不端行为有多种形式对供应商施加不当的压力、捕获消费者、通过媒体控制政治制度，等等。或者说，企业规模大到能够从公共当局获得多种利益和支持。“大而不倒”（too big tofail)，倒闭是不可想象的事，因为这将\n\n附录二反垄断嬉皮士与芝加哥学派\n\n① Lina M. KHAN, «Amazon's antitrust paradox», Yale Law Journal, vol. 126, n°3, 2016, p. 737.\n\n211","previous_page":210,"next_page":212}