{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":212,"pdf_page":252,"physical_index":252,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f67284adab47124eabd39668553471ee37365ef91e6bc3bebbe766346b43c709"},"chapter":"第四章","content":"构成系统性威胁。\n\n这些关于经济权力集中的经济、社会和政治危险的论点完全正确。但汗和反垄断嬉皮士的论点更进一步，这不仅是一个指出私人垄断的危险的问题，也是一个重视竞争本身的问题。最终，与《大宪章》的作者一样，汗也希望建立一个分散、和谐的竞争秩序。他们对私人企业家经济的规范性理念如出一辙。从这个角度看，竞争不是手段，而是目的，竞争本身就是一个理想的目标。\n\n反垄断政策必须防止产业过于集中，因为这会对竞争构成威胁。汗在这一点上说得非常清楚：“反垄断法和竞争政策应促进竞争性市场，而非消费者福利。”①反垄断的目的是保持“竞争过程的中立性和市场结构的开放性”②。此处值得强调的是，美国的嬉皮士反垄断、欧盟的竞争政策及其所依据的秩序自由主义理论之间具有相似性。\n\n2017年和2018年，欧盟对美国数字巨头的诉讼让谷歌付出了两笔创纪录的罚款，共计67亿欧元。在一起案件中，谷歌因在搜索引擎中偏袒自家购物比价工具的可见度而被罚款。在另一起案件中，谷歌强迫安卓手机制造商预装一揽子谷歌服务，从而能够集中大多数智能手机的用户数据。此前，谷歌在欧洲发布了一份新闻稿，对巴里·林恩被新美国基金会驱逐一事表示欢迎。\n\n技术封建主义\n\n① Lina M. KHAN, «Amazon's antitrust paradox», Yale Law Journal, vol. 126, n°3, 2016, p. 737.\n\n② Lina M. KHAN, «Amazon's antitrust paradox» Yale Law Journal , vol. 126, n° 3, 2016, p. 743.\n\n212","previous_page":211,"next_page":213}