{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":213,"pdf_page":253,"physical_index":253,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"f0cdefb01bcb20dab494e7948c4adacd130a620410a4bd4bac61395368b44f69"},"chapter":"第四章","content":"反过来说，正是莉娜·汗的研究促使欧盟委员会对亚马逊展开调查。竞争事务专员玛格丽特·维斯塔格（MargretheVestager）与汗的分析不谋而合，她说，问题的关键在于亚马逊的双重身份既是其他公司产品的分销平台，又是自己产品的销售网站。这种一体化的结构使亚马逊能够独占客户和供应商的数据，并由此获得其至高无上的地位。①\n\n通过这场嬉皮士反垄断的斗争，我们看到了新自由主义内部斗争的新阶段。一方面，芝加哥方法的继承者站在米歇尔·福柯所谓的无政府资本主义一边，原则上反对国家对经济和社会领域的任何形式的干预。另一方面，传统反垄断法的倡导者重演了美国自1938年以来不同思潮之间的和解。②\n\n此时，制度主义经济学家和新自由主义经济学家趋于一致，前者放弃了对公共监管与合作的偏好，后者则背离了自由放任的信条。对他们来说，针对垄断的公共干预似乎是必要的。对于前者来说，这是一个防止经济权力过于集中而威胁政治自由的问题。后者则希望通过价格保持资源配置过程的质量。\n\n附录二 反垄断嬉皮士与芝加哥学派\n\n① Natalia DROZDIAK et David MCLAUGHLIN, «With Amazon probe, EU takes cue from “hipster\" antitrust», Bloomberg. com, 19 septembre 2018.\n\n② Thierry KIRAT et Frédéric MARTY, « The late emerging consensus among American economists on antitrust laws in the second New Deal», Cirano, n° 2019s - 12, mai 2019.\n\n213","previous_page":212,"next_page":214}