{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":51,"pdf_page":91,"physical_index":91,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1ff0406efb5ac0bc41c91fbe421e533cd8329bb6ad600896dcceb4a89a1e082d"},"chapter":"第一章","content":"这种社会两极分化的态势因强调雇员的流动性而得到加强。虽然这对高素质员工的知识传播有积极作用，但对绝大多数其他员工来说，灵活性就是工作不稳定的代名词。硅谷的情况也很典型，近三分之一的人口收入不足以满足基本需求，贫困现象普遍存在。根深蒂固的种族和性别不平等现象持续存在，而且往往比美国其他地区更为明显，这也破坏了人们推崇的多元化开放理念。①\n\n最后，不平等与创新之间的关系还有一个严格的地理维度。创新就是发现新的组合，就是把以前没有的东西放在一起、组织起来。为了实现这一目标，邻近性和直接互动是至关重要的事，以便从发现过程所必需的社会授粉中受益。这一过程所需的隐性知识大多植根于现实生活的社交网络中。因此，参与创造性活动的人有兴趣聚集在一起，从非正式交流中获益，从而提高他们的生产力和收入。②然而，这导致了隔离。不仅创新集中在大城市地区①，在城市与乡村两极分化的同时，城市地区之间的社会分化也在加深，包括每个城市内部不同社群之间的分化。\n\n第一章 加州意识形态的苦难\n\n① Molly TURNER, « Homelessness in the Bay Area», The Urbanist, n° 560, 2017; David ROTMAN, «Technology and inequality», MIT Technology Review, 21 octobre 2014.\n\n② 这一点在 1990—2010 年期间的美国得到了证明。参见：Enrico BERKES et RubenGAETANI, «Income segregation and rise of the knowledge economy», SSRN, 2018, en ligne.论创新与不平等的一般关系，同样使用的是美国的例子，参见：Philippe AGHION et al.，«Innovation and top income inequality», NBER Working Paper, n° 21247, 2015.\n\n051","previous_page":50,"next_page":52}