{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":52,"pdf_page":92,"physical_index":92,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"201371624e36879e68acfcbef2cfc7b203e11ed9de763cb3d4ecb8492ea6523c"},"chapter":"第一章","content":"在此，加州意识形态再次被当代的发展颠覆。《大宪章》承诺“让尽可能多的人掌握先进的计算机技术，可以缓解高速公路拥堵，减少空气污染，让人们远离拥挤的市区”②。但事实恰恰相反。事实上，“发生在哪里”已变得至关重要一生活在时髦思想流通的城市和社群，是获取与无形资产全球传播相关的部分收入的关键条件。全球范围内，那些生产和估价无形产品的地方，也是最具吸引力的职业机会聚集地。也许未来的技术发展会使就近的信息优势消失殆尽，或者分散的力量（污染、拥堵、租金价格等）最终会取而代之，但到目前为止，无形资产正在加剧空间两极分化。③\n\n聚焦空间维度，我们可以清晰地认识到，硅谷的理念无法照搬套用。这种经验源于专业化的逻辑，随着时间的推移，这种逻辑不断自我强化，最终形成了这一世界级的创新集群。这也解释了为何除班加罗尔、新加坡、中国的广东省和浙江省、波士顿和特拉维夫等少数成功案例外，其他地区复制硅谷模式的尝试大多以失败告终。诚然，每一次尝试都可能存在政治决策上的失误，这些失误或许可以解释部分梦想破灭的原因。①然而，根本原因在于，一味模仿硅谷模式注定无法成功。硅谷的“岛屿”需要硅谷之外的“海洋”才能生存。商品在硅谷之外的地方组装、分类和运输。动物在那些边缘的土地上饲养和宰杀，植物在那里生长。废物被运输到那些被忽视的空间。简而言之，这片居住着绝大多数人口的广袤世界，由于一种忽视地理区位创新潜力的外部条件的共识，被简化为微不足道的部分。因此，“硅谷共识”建立在构成谬误的基础上—硅谷的经验被作为一种可以模仿的模式，而它之所以值得模仿，恰恰因为它几乎是独一无二的。\n\n技术封建主义\n\n① Pierre-Alexandre BALLAND et al., «Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities», SSRN, 2018, en ligne.\n\n② Esther DYSON et al., «Cyberspace and the American dream», The Progress and Freedom Foundation, vol. 1, n° 2, p. 302; «Does it encourage geographic concentration? Second wave policies encourage people to congregate physically; third wave policies permit people to work at home, and to live wherever they choose», «Cyberspace and the American dream», loc. cit., p. 307.\n\n③ Jonathan HASKEL et Stian WESTLAKE, Capitalism without Capital. The Rise of the Intangible Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2018, chapitre VI.\n\n052","previous_page":51,"next_page":53}