{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":56,"pdf_page":96,"physical_index":96,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"21a099c4bc70cb24c3bc148602aa6239ae2f8f64d835f217d31fb95e05bded56"},"chapter":"第一章","content":"但令人惊讶的是，这种技术组织上的混乱并没有转化为资本主义机器的新活力。菲利普·阿吉翁是最著名的增长经济学家之一，他不得不承认这一点，尽管他只是口头上说说而已。在法兰西学院的就职演讲中，他根据标准专利数据指出：“我们确实看到了创新的加速，不仅在数量上，而且在质量上。”②他接着问道：“为什么创新的加速没有反映在增长和生产力上？”答案在于这“本质上是一个衡量问题”，因为创新—尤其是那些导致创造新产品的创新—需要经过一段时间才能被纳入统计。③\n\n技术封建主义\n\n① Naomi R. LAMOREAUX, Daniel M. G. RAFF et Peter TEMIN, «Beyond markets and hierarchies: toward a new synthesis of American business history» , NBER Working Paper, n° 9029, 2002.\n\n② Philippe AGHION, Repenser la croissance économique, Collège de France/Fayard, «Les leçons inaugurales», Paris, 2016, p. 43.\n\n③ Philippe AGHION et al., «Missing growth from creative destruction», AmericanEconomic Review，vol. 109，n°8，p. 2795-2822. 对所用方法的详细批评，参见：MichelHUSSON, «Monsieur Philippe Aghion bouleverse la croissance», À l'encontre (blog) , 6juillet2017。虽然阿吉翁拒绝使用“停滞”一词，但自他就职演讲以来，他的立场已经发生了变化。他承认生产力和经济增长呈下降趋势，但并未对当前形势做出解释，而是提到了低利率对资本分配的危害以及公共服务的削弱。参见法兰西学院网站上的讲座录音，尤其是2017年10月17日的讲座。\n\n056","previous_page":55,"next_page":57}