{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":66,"pdf_page":106,"physical_index":106,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"171918a6b06de73beb4b81c9a8802904f711deb5abc86a7906edc2b3e3b8f5ae"},"chapter":"第一章","content":"技术封建主义\n\n技术发展过程中的神秘面纱，举例说明了苹果公司的成功在很大程度上归功于公共支出。最重要的是，这本书把战略思维问题重新置于创新经济学的核心，表明这不仅是研发支出的数额问题，将支出分配给机会最大的行业才是关键。这是对欧洲盛行理论的明确否定。欧洲领导人对硅谷神话信以为真，有意削弱了国家的创业职能，从而极大地阻碍了生产力的发展，加剧了旧大陆的社会和经济困难。\n\n综上所述，对硅谷的广泛提及揭示了它本身明显的自相矛盾之处。“创业精神”让位于私人垄断的掠夺。对自主和个人创造力的颂扬，导致了计算机化的管理工具，加剧了工资隶属关系。地域两极分化、收益集中在少数“赢家”手中以及知识流通的障碍正在助长边缘化的动力，这既阻碍了创新，也妨碍了人们享受创新带来的潜在好处。随着发展，硅谷和更广泛的创新世界已经成为与最初取得成功的原则相悖的现实。这种演变如此明显，以至于背后的理论在很大程度上已经过时，这使得今天对这一神话的政治动员完全不合时宜。乔纳森·哈斯凯尔(Jonathan Haskel） 和斯蒂安·韦斯特莱克（Stian Westlake）沮丧地指出，从那个时代继承下来的创新支持政策最终陷入了恶性循环：\n\n为使经济蓬勃发展，决策者将努力创造信任和强有力的制度，鼓励开放机会，缓解社会冲突，防止有实力的企业沉溺于食利行为。但与此同时，高效的无形经济似乎会加剧所有这些问题，造成极具争议的不平等形式，威胁到社会资本，并催生出以保护无形资产为已任的强势企业。①\n\n066","previous_page":65,"next_page":67}