{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":68,"pdf_page":108,"physical_index":108,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"5af314aba0f2b09fec2b5b6833bc563c8e124380c185ea79222de23672ae5eb2"},"chapter":"第一章","content":"从另一个角度看，硅谷公司对个人自由和民主权利的蔑视也具有重要意义。我们记得麦克卢汉曾经预言，信息技术将粉碎等级结构，也记得谷歌领导层有信心为“将权力从国家和机构下放并转移给个人”做出贡献。这些承诺与增长前景不符。\n\n在明目张胆的威权主义之外，西方老牌民主国家的政治生活受到了更为隐蔽的侵蚀。温迪·布朗（WendyBrown）谈到了“消解民主”一词，以表明新自由主义政策正在从民主生活中榨取实质内容，而民主生活正处于公共辩论日渐平淡、民众对关键经济问题的影响日渐减弱的困境之中。②\n\n这些殊途同归的趋势让人们对20世纪中叶以来所谓“自由民主”的脆弱性提出疑问，并促使人们重新认真思考德国哲学家尤尔根·哈贝马斯（Jürgen Habermas）于1962年提出的“重新塑造公共领域”的假设。①\n\n技术封建主义\n\n① Steven LEVITSKY et Daniel ZIBLATT, How Democracies Die, The Viking Press, New York, 2018; Roberto S. FOA et Yascha MOUNK, «The danger of deconsolidation», Journal of Democracy, vol. 27, n° 3, 2016, p. 5-17; Roberto S. FOA et Yascha MOUNK, «The end of the consolidation paradigm, a response to our critics», Journal of Democracy-Web Exchange, 28 avril 2017; Robert KUTTNER, Can Democracy Survive Global Capitalism ?, Norton, New York, 2018, p. XVII; Yascha MOUNK, The People vs. Democracy. Why our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save It, Harvard University Press，Cambridge，2018.这些著作由让-法比安·斯皮茨（Jean-Fabien Spitz）用法语简 述。参见：Jean-Fabien SPITZ, «Le capita-lisme démocratique. La fin d'une exception historique?», laviedesidées. fr, 10 juillet 2018。\n\n② Wendy BROWN, Undoing the Demos. Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution, Zone Books, New York, 2017.\n\n068","previous_page":67,"next_page":69}