{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","id":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","uuid":"06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title":"[数字经济前沿]技术封建主义","normalized_title":"数字经济前沿技术封建主义","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300328508","isbns":["9787300328508"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":259,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E6%95%B0%E5%AD%97%E7%BB%8F%E6%B5%8E%E5%89%8D%E6%B2%BF%5D%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%B0%81%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/06dd97ec-cce5-45df-9acf-40e36f07dab3/search"},"page":{"printed_page":71,"pdf_page":111,"physical_index":111,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"09534b328d05cb2b225e10efd18b67daa8cacfc54870d98b5de52145e12adf4c"},"chapter":"第一章","content":"这一分析强调了自由主义骗局的政治维度，该骗局声称将资本主义纳入市场经济，这种经济体制建立在平等交换的基础上。这个神话由19世纪的自由主义理论家提出，至今仍存在于政治家的咆哮之中，他们像20世纪90年代拥护硅谷意识形态的纽特·金里奇一样，承诺建立小业主资本主义。但是，当初创企业创始人之间的公开竞争导致新的垄断统治时，会发生什么？或者更笼统地说，当社会在生产资料所有者和无产阶级化的社会阶级之间产生两极分化时，以及像今天一样，不平等现象在全球范围内扩大，以利于极少数超级富豪的利益时，会发生什么？这些情况表明了经济权力的根本不对称，破坏了就普遍利益进行理性民主讨论的任何可能性。由于这种两极分化，国家干预经济利益斗争的方式垄断了大部分公众辩论。被削弱的部门要求采取纠正行动，最强大的部门则极力反对。资本主义的结构性不平等，尤其是它在当代的加剧，使得私人领域和公共行动无法区分，同时也消除了普遍利益的范畴。\n\n批判性理性辩论的空间被控制资源的另外两种权力（金钱和行政权力）的交织所扼杀。战后福利国家的崛起使一些人希望资产阶级公共领域将被一种公共元领域（public meta-sphere）所取代，这种公共元领域有能力组织各组织之间的辩论，而这些组织的内部生活本应受到丰富的民主辩论的滋养。\n\n第一章 加州意识形态的苦难\n\n071","previous_page":70,"next_page":72}