{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title":"信息社会理论（第三版）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301189559","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","uuid":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title":"信息社会理论（第三版）","normalized_title":"信息社会理论第三版","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301189559","isbns":["9787301189559","0415406331"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%89%E7%89%88%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/search"},"page":{"printed_page":205,"pdf_page":221,"physical_index":221,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0622930df85217f4f7af09b6c81814aaa043a0e6d1fcd80dc52c20bfdd3476f0"},"chapter":"第七章信息与民主：尤尔根·哈贝马斯","content":"第七章信息与民主：尤尔根·哈贝马斯\n\n“信息社会”的许多评论家们虽然承认当今时代流通的信息越来越丰富，但他们并不热衷于宣布“信息时代”的来临，秉持这一见解的学者倾向于认为信息蒙受了污染，或者是遭遇了一些团体的干预，这些团体要么“控制”信息再现，要么为了特定的立场而“包装”信息以对人们进行劝服，要么“操纵”信息以达到自身的目的，要么把信息生产成一种娱乐性的可销售的商品。这些思想家们勾画了“信息社会”的图景—各类广告活动的宣传站、国防部的“误导情报策略”(“dis-information”strategies)、各种公共关系的“专家”、议会的“说客”、高明政府政策的“陈述者”(presenter)、靠近首相的“来源可靠”的“官方透露的信息”(officialleak)，它们在信息的生产和传播中，全程扮演着各取所需的角色。\n\n这一流派最极端的观点认为——如果公众获得的信息有所缺失，民主进程本身将会遭受破坏。因为，如果公众被拒绝于可靠的信息之门外，或者说他们自愿拒绝接受可靠的信息，那么又如何能够培养出选民的深刻洞察力、协商能力与远见卓识呢？选民没有这些素养，民主社会又何以为继？马里兰大学在2004年总统选举中开展的一项民意调查显示，几乎70%的乔治·W. 布什(George W. Bush)的支持者深信萨达姆·侯赛因(Saddam Hussein)为基地组织(Al\n\n205","previous_page":204,"next_page":206}