{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title":"信息社会理论（第三版）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301189559","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","uuid":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title":"信息社会理论（第三版）","normalized_title":"信息社会理论第三版","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301189559","isbns":["9787301189559","0415406331"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%89%E7%89%88%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/search"},"page":{"printed_page":216,"pdf_page":232,"physical_index":232,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6654b7bf0842c1116b1e4f260b9faff8faaa6ef8409dce81ea4d89fa32d6338f"},"chapter":"第七章信息与民主：尤尔根·哈贝马斯","content":"BBC创建于20世纪初，其运作一开始就有意识地与商界保持距离，原因是当年在营运问题上，激进分子与保守分子罕见地联袂行动，不费吹灰之力就达成了共识—BBC理应属于国家性机构，脱离私人资本利益。观察家们已经目睹了美国推行自由市场，就广播电视业而言，不仅强制性售卖推销节目，而且市场混乱，如此糟糕的局势，在英国国内却产生了诡异的联手打造BBC。正如历史学家泰勒(A. J. P. Taylor,1965)所指出的，“保守党(Conservatives)崇尚权威，而工党(Labour)憎恶私有企业”(p.233)。此一联合致使双方两相情愿维护“广播电视服务应该由一家公共企业来提供，该企业作为国家利益的受托者(Trustee)，其地位和职责应该与一个公共服务部门的地位和职责相一致”(Smith，1974，p.53)。\n\n这样，BBC“从在英国创建之初，就是议会的产物，是在国家之内的民族文化使馆”(Smith，1973，p.54)。BBC获得了垄断广播电视业的授权，其资金主要来源于对收音机听众(后来是电视观众)征收的税金(执照费)(the licence fee)，不论听众是否愿意 BBC由议会建立以及它与商界保持距离。此一举措意义深远，该机构的操作尊重了立法委员们的呼吁，即广播电视既是娱乐的工具，也必须强调其教育功能。多年以来，这种“资讯、教育和娱乐”的精神融会贯通于BBC生产的新闻节目和为少数群体提供的音乐、文学、戏剧以及兴趣类节目，此一理念在BBC逐步得到巩固。\n\n216\n\n信息社会理论","previous_page":215,"next_page":217}