{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title":"信息社会理论（第三版）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301189559","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","uuid":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title":"信息社会理论（第三版）","normalized_title":"信息社会理论第三版","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301189559","isbns":["9787301189559","0415406331"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%89%E7%89%88%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/search"},"page":{"printed_page":31,"pdf_page":47,"physical_index":47,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"1ba3b6c6308acc894fe2f002b2ed843392c4bdc35b1be80aa732da98c65ef8f2"},"chapter":"第二章什么是信息社会","content":"信息带有安全的中立特征；研究者堆砌的数据意味着无懈可击的事实，这既简单，又有助益。如此单纯的外表，正是一个技术决定论尽可能掩盖其目标的行政议程中最完美的起点。毕竟，谁又会说反对信息？\n\n(Roszak,1986,p. 19)\n\n罗斯扎克不遗余力地与量化信息的想法论战。无论是电脑的使用普及程度如何飙升，或是新科技数据处理能力如何增强，或是新科技的数字程序处理能力如何提升，或是数字网络的创造力如何强大，这些统计数据不断堆积、翻新的结果，就是人们欣然地相信信息是社会系统的基础。上述现象不胜枚举，意在促使我们认同信息社会理论家所坚持的—人类已经进入了一个全新的社会类型的观点。但西奥多·罗斯扎克向来反对“信息数量增多，新型社会就产生”这个论点，他坚持维系人类文明的“统治意识”(masterideas)并不是完全建立在信息的基础上。像“是对是错，吾爱吾国”、“自己活也让别人活”、“我们都是神的孩子”以及“己所不欲，勿施于人”这些原则都是我们社会的中心理念——但它们在信息理论家所言说的信息出现以前便存在了。罗斯扎克并不认为这些或其他“统治意识”都必须得正确(实际上，很多都充满偏见——比如，“所有犹太人都腰缠万贯”、“女人天生柔顺”、“黑人是天生的运动健将”)，他所强调的是这些理念及其必需的质化评估(qualitative engagement)胜于信息的定量测\n\n第二章 什么是信息社会\n\n31","previous_page":30,"next_page":32}