{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title":"信息社会理论（第三版）","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301189559","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","id":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","uuid":"09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title":"信息社会理论（第三版）","normalized_title":"信息社会理论第三版","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787301189559","isbns":["9787301189559","0415406331"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":409,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA%EF%BC%88%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%89%E7%89%88%EF%BC%89","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/09704571-8786-4559-8834-09ba7e197fc0/search"},"page":{"printed_page":81,"pdf_page":97,"physical_index":97,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3fc89e4b06efec3f5247dda4b224e67da70cc403b8dc8ec11becd9fc86d7b53b"},"chapter":"第四章调节学派理论","content":"本章将集中讨论两个互相关联的思想阵营，就分析理由而言，颇为在理。一方提出理解当代发展的模式是福特主义(Fordist)到后福特主义(post-Fordist，或者新福特主义 neo-Fordist)的转型；而另一方则认为，我们正远离批量生产(mass production)的时代而步入弹性专殊化(Flexible Specialization)宰制的社会。在笔者看来，上述路径是对当代社会、经济、政治变化的思考中最系统化和影响最深远的理解方式之一。\n\n上述两个学派有着截然不同的观点，笔者以自己的分析框架洞察这些评论家之间的分歧所在。在讨论从福特主义到后福特主义的主张时，本章集中论述发源于调节学派的理论思想。调节学派理论的主要创始人有经济学家阿兰·利比茨(AlainLipietz,1987)、米歇尔·阿格利埃塔(Michel Aglietta,1998)、罗贝尔·博耶(Robert Bo-yer，1990)，此外，还会加上几个独立分析的学者，特别是大卫·哈维(DavidHarvey，1989b)、斯科特·拉什和约翰·厄尔里，他们就变化的主要观点与调节学派存在着不少共识。当谈到弹性专业主义理论时，笔者会集中讨论在这个领域最具影响力的标志性著作——迈克尔·皮奥雷(Michael Piore)和查尔斯·萨贝尔(Charles Sabel)的《第二次工业革命》(The Second Industrial Divide,1984)\n\n仅就本章的篇幅难以全面展示上述思想贡献的深度、分歧和差异，笔者只能作一简要追溯与概括，突出这些解释中信息的作用和地位。如此谋篇布局，不只是因为本书的主题是信息，也不仅仅因为信息是组成这些假设转型的重要元素，笔者更希望能让读者更好地理解信息在当今社会的特征和形式。\n\n第四章 调节学派理论\n\n81","previous_page":80,"next_page":82}