{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","title":"Pressed for Time The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780226196473","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","id":"0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","uuid":"0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","title":"Pressed for Time The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism","normalized_title":"pressedfortimetheaccelerationoflifeindigitalcapitalism","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780226196473","isbns":["9780226196473","9780226196503"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":228,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Pressed%20for%20Time%20The%20Acceleration%20of%20Life%20in%20Digital%20Capitalism","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50/search"},"page":{"printed_page":147,"pdf_page":159,"physical_index":159,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"69d377c763eadb1b41cc3f28b056142bf4e223952694e4de4bfe4260d287c40d"},"chapter":"Pressed for Time","content":"If connected relationships blur the experience of absence and presence, then by implication they are disrupting and rearticulating the public and private spheres. Having examined the claim that ICTs extend our working time, I now want to interrogate the related claim that they intrude on our intimate and family-based communication time. In other words, does the constant connection aforded by mobile modalities transform the quality of personal relationships? After all, families remain a crucial relational entity playing a fundamental part in the intimate life and connections between individuals. And building and maintaining relationships does take time together. So does the fact that we spend almost half of our waking hours using media and communications technologies leave us less time to talk face-to-face?20\n\nHardly a month goes by in which there isn’t a new article or book on the subject of whether digital devices bring us together or push us apart. Just as in some early debates about the impact of television, many express the view that smartphones, tablets, and laptops are hollowing out our personal relationships and family time. In these scenarios, media use is portrayed as a replacement for, rather than a complement to, copresent family contact. For example, I have already mentioned Turkle’s well-known argument that ICTs dilute the quality of time families spend together because individual family members are glued to a screen instead of socializing with each other.21 Far from allowing us to communicate better, she views technology as isolating us in a cyber-reality that is a poor imitation of the human world. Addicted to multitasking on their BlackBerries, parents do not give children their full attention, and teenagers have become scared of the immediacy of talking on the telephone.\n\nWhile some of the initial research did suggest that the introduction of the web increased loneliness, there has since been a plethora of studies showing that heavy users tend to have more, not less, social contact.22 About half of British Internet users, for example, say that the Internet has increased the contact they have with friends and family.23 And rather than replacing other forms of interaction with family and friends, the Internet complements other forms of contact. Most people communicate with family and friends at least once a week. Their means of keeping in touch are, in order of importance, face-to-face visits (84 percent), text messages (62 percent), telephone calls (60 percent mobile; 48 percent landline) and e-mails (33 percent). Around a quarter of adults use instant messaging on a weekly basis, and around one-tenth use mail to keep in touch with friends and family.24\n\nTime to Talk\n\n147","previous_page":146,"next_page":148}