{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","title":"Pressed for Time The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780226196473","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","id":"0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","uuid":"0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","title":"Pressed for Time The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism","normalized_title":"pressedfortimetheaccelerationoflifeindigitalcapitalism","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9780226196473","isbns":["9780226196473","9780226196503"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":228,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/Pressed%20for%20Time%20The%20Acceleration%20of%20Life%20in%20Digital%20Capitalism","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0cf5c9df-7116-426e-ae21-ce72b2ccbe50/search"},"page":{"printed_page":164,"pdf_page":176,"physical_index":176,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6ff4732752fb988cdf3ea6724a3bfe7e474c19085b4510545926708657fb671d"},"chapter":"Pressed for Time","content":"society in which technological acceleration produces not more leisure and downtime, but in fact an ever-faster pace of life.\n\nHere, I am interested in how we can make more of time. It is not literally possible to make time in the sense of adding another hour to the day. Rather, the key to understanding the fraught and complex relationship between technology and time is the concept of temporal sovereignty, the ability to choose how you allocate your time. I have argued that having discretionary control or autonomy over your time lies at the core of some positive notions of freedom. It is a significant measure of life satisfaction and well-being. The proliferation of hypereficient ICTs that should help us take control of time, seem instead to control us. As in the classic Frankenstein myth, it is often lamented that we have lost control over the machines to which we gave birth. We wonder whether a faster life, replete with gizmos, is necessarily a better life when the trade-of between time and money seems to turn every hour into the rush hour.\n\nCertainly it is hard to disentangle the profound social changes that have occurred in our lifetime from the closely interconnected transformations in technological systems. However, it is only by examining the acceleration society thesis in some forensic detail that we can identify which aspects of life are accelerating, which are slowing down, and for whom. My social shaping framework has undermined the notion that the acceleration of work, parenting, and leisure is directly driven by technology. In tandem with technological change, I have shown that major shifts in the nature of work, the composition of families, ideas about parenting, and patterns of consumption have all contributed to our sense that the world is moving faster than hitherto.\n\nThe experience of time pressure, or harriedness, then, is not simply a function of machine speed. It is therefore not amenable to resolution by means of a digital detox diet: “periodically shut down the electronic prostheses dictating our worlds and lives. . . . Shut of the cell phone; ignore e-mail; disable the answering machine and caller ID.”2 In any event, I do not subscribe to the nostalgia for a more natural, less technologically suffused past that some advocates for slow time champion. Rather, returning to Donna Haraway, I want to embrace the emancipatory potential of technoscience to create new meanings and new worlds while at the same time being its chief critic.\n\nThe design of our devices and the material infrastructure we inhabit reflects, as much as shapes, the society in which we live. It embodies the dominant engineering approach to time saving and time ordering, a particular conception of eficiency. Likewise, the promises and cultural imaginaries of a technological future populated with robots and autonomous software agents project limited visions of a good society. Opening up the processes of technical innovation to encompass a broader range of societal realities and concerns is the only way to generate new devices for new times.\n\nChapter seven\n\n164","previous_page":163,"next_page":165}