{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title":"技术哲学讲演录","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300232317","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","uuid":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title":"技术哲学讲演录","normalized_title":"技术哲学讲演录","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300232317","isbns":["9787300232317"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":262,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AE%B2%E6%BC%94%E5%BD%95","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":101,"pdf_page":109,"physical_index":109,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"38158acfe08c6318af78fe72f12e0a7afddd27d77acc8341242cc7ca87bd8adf"},"chapter":"技术哲学讲演录","content":"现代技术并不要求你是一个通才。我们的确应该严肃认真地考虑这样的问题：像我们东南大学这样的工科院校是否需要人文教育。如果没有对工业社会的一个批判性反思，大学教育应该如何办的问题就得不到严肃认真的解决。这涉及现代化道路的选择问题。马克思开辟的这些思路，后来都被大大推进，统称为“技术的政治批判和社会批判”。当然我们也要注意到，马克思本人是一种温和的技术决定论，他并不认为技术完全能决定制度。他不是还提到人的全面发展吗？他认为共产主义要比资本主义制度能更好地促进技术的发展，他在讲这个话的时候，技术仿佛又成为中性的东西。在这里，马克思显然是不彻底的。在中国，大家都知道，最盛行的就是技术中性论。今天我们要重新讨论这个问题，既是对马克思思想遗产的一种继承，也是要把这个思路往下推进。\n\n技术与政治\n\n101","previous_page":100,"next_page":102}