{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title":"技术哲学讲演录","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300232317","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","uuid":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title":"技术哲学讲演录","normalized_title":"技术哲学讲演录","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300232317","isbns":["9787300232317"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":262,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AE%B2%E6%BC%94%E5%BD%95","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":163,"pdf_page":171,"physical_index":171,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"0c53f04d23ab3a94f2d26f5ba19595d6a984b60a5635281f7935067ff14cc1f5"},"chapter":"技术哲学讲演录","content":"中国缺乏现代哲学传统，反而可以在白纸上描画。我们中国人近代以来对于西方的学术是兼收并蓄、兼容并包，没有什么忌讳，什么资源都可以用，美国、法国、德国的资源都可以利用。因此，我们可以满怀信心地对科技哲学的同行们说，技术哲学是个有前途的学科。我在1999年写了篇很小的文章，题目是《技术哲学，一个有着伟大未来的学科》，表达的就是这么一个意思。在此之前，我一直在做科学思想史研究，基本的落脚点是“idea”，“科学”是我关注的核心。如今搞技术哲学，对我来说是一个革命性的转折：“技术”能不能独立，能不能取代“理性”、“观念”成为哲学的核心，是很难的事情，这里面存在着大量的冲突与矛盾，对我本人来说也是个痛苦的思想过程。今天我仍然不能说自己已经完成了这个转折。\n\n技术作为存在论差异\n\n163","previous_page":null,"next_page":164}