{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title":"技术哲学讲演录","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300232317","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","uuid":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title":"技术哲学讲演录","normalized_title":"技术哲学讲演录","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300232317","isbns":["9787300232317"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":262,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AE%B2%E6%BC%94%E5%BD%95","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":170,"pdf_page":178,"physical_index":178,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"9784a2dfb424235b12d67d1e878a9f4afd8f0f7dcfcc96842280a0f6b94195fa"},"chapter":"技术哲学讲演录","content":"悲观主义要更深刻一些。悲观主义认为技术是自主的，并不在我们人类的掌握之中，相反人却受到了技术的限制，人成为技术进化的工具，或者说成为技术自我增殖的一个工具。技术悲观主义的深刻在于把握住了技术的内在本性。过去很长时间以来，技术不能进入哲学的视野，就是因为认为技术是外在的。亚里士多德说制作物不像自然物，其本原不在它自己的内部。哲学的历史是内在性的历史，哲学讲理性，理性讲自我推理、独立不依、内在演绎，所以内在性是理性的本质。而技术没有这种本质，所以从柏拉图、亚里士多德开始，技术就是实现他者的目的，即人的目的，技术本身则无所谓目的。所以技术这种天生属于外在性领域的东西当然进入不了哲学的视野。技术的自主论在某种意义上恢复了技术的内在性，认为技术自身有目的。技术好像是某种有机体一样，它自己发展、增殖和扩充。所以我认为当代技术哲学的崛起根源于技术自主性的发现，没有技术自主论，技术永远徘徊在哲学视野之外。技术有了自主性就有了存在发展的内在依据和力量；而当技术只是作为工具，技术中性论的观点普遍流行时，对于技术本身的研究就变得可有可无，需要关注的只是技术的社会后果、伦理后果之类的“后果”。\n\n170\n\n技术哲学讲演录","previous_page":169,"next_page":171}