{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title":"技术哲学讲演录","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300232317","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","uuid":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title":"技术哲学讲演录","normalized_title":"技术哲学讲演录","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300232317","isbns":["9787300232317"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":262,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AE%B2%E6%BC%94%E5%BD%95","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":183,"pdf_page":191,"physical_index":191,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a345d9b4a2340a0ca9450397f3420b01c4ef59ee01950e597c8110a51733145f"},"chapter":"技术哲学讲演录","content":"现在我们有几个问题需要进一步展开。第一个问题是技术怎样作为时间性来理解；第二个问题是技术与身体的关系，这在过去是被完全忽视的。从柏拉图开始，就没有重视这个问题。苏格拉底大义凛然地就义，就是因为对于身体的无所谓。技术与时间的关系关键是理解技术怎么超前、如何滞后。当马克思说“技术是拉动历史的火车头”时，就是表明了技术的超前性。它是如何拉动的呢？它是通过“超前”的方式来拉动。引诱是一种拉动，通过一种美妙后果的先行驻入来拉动。比如你渴了，说前面有梅子，那个梅子还没有看到，但是它已经先行地在你的大脑里出现，而成为拉动你往梅园走的动力。技术的拉动作用就是“超前”。技术也有“滞后”作用，这体现为技术的保守性。比如有些人就不用网络，不用电脑，坚持用手写，这就是滞后。滞后并不只是负面的意义，也有它正面的意义。技术的“超前”与“滞后”的理论问题不解决，当代技术的快速发展对于人类生存所造成的不适应问题的解决就没有坚实的基础。我们究竟是迁就技术的一日千里呢？还是要有所停顿呢?这些选择的最终依据是什么？\n\n技术作为存在论差异\n\n183","previous_page":182,"next_page":184}