{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title":"技术哲学讲演录","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300232317","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","id":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","uuid":"0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title":"技术哲学讲演录","normalized_title":"技术哲学讲演录","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787300232317","isbns":["9787300232317"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":262,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%E5%93%B2%E5%AD%A6%E8%AE%B2%E6%BC%94%E5%BD%95","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f40c523-39cd-4e7b-a973-519cea52237f/search"},"page":{"printed_page":245,"pdf_page":253,"physical_index":253,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"3fecd0c658f451be3b3fd6eb5462ccbe6461ff87a6df29fffb99584160ae1e07"},"chapter":"技术哲学讲演录","content":"我们可以从另外一个角度来讲一讲，绝对空间概念根本就不是一个需要诉诸操作的概念。这就是康德的思路。康德在追问知识的先决条件时发现，我们需要一个先验空间作为我们的感性形式，从而获得稳定的感性材料。在空间的变换过程中我们的经验要保持稳定不变。比如说我们在北京做了个实验，通常我们假定这个实验在上海也是有效的，不然的话，科学知识就是不可能的。这就要求空间必须是均匀的，空间本身对实验不产生任何本质性的影响。所以实验的可重复性实际上是建立在时间和空间的均匀性之上的，如果空间不均匀，那么我们的科学知识就无法建构。这种均匀的空间来自哪里呢?康德称之为“先天感性形式”。这是个先天的条件，如果没有这个条件，知识就产生不出来。现在有了知识，反推就一定有这个先天条件。这就是康德说的空间作为先验感性形式的来历。这个先验时空，从某种意义上讲，跟牛顿主张的绝对时空道理是完\n\n爱因斯坦在操作性原则的要求之下搞出了狭义相对论，但是并没有消除基本物理概念的不可操作性这一现实，从这个意义上讲，他并没有真的把牛顿打倒。\n\n近代科学的形而上学基础\n\n245","previous_page":244,"next_page":246}