{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","uuid":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","normalized_title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","isbns":["9787208154346"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%AE%BA%E6%95%B0%E7%A0%81%E7%89%A9%E7%9A%84%E5%AD%98%E5%9C%A8","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/search"},"page":{"printed_page":121,"pdf_page":131,"physical_index":131,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e9afbc38acab623ebf146014831a3d367c6db7970d35296bd4799c95fa06d24c"},"chapter":"第三章","content":"让我们考虑一下，由于相等是一种关系，严格来讲，它不是算术本身的属性，而仅仅是由心智在它们之间的比较产生的。[65]\n\n如果比较是基础，那么每一种关系都是外在的。继承休谟，我们实际上可以通过他的七个类别开展关系分析。人们可以想象，海德格尔或许不会轻易认同这一点，因为他自然会反对形式化。然而，对休谟而言，他对关系的理解有着在实体一偶性与质料一形式方面否定形而上学传统二元论的激进性。我们甚至可以进一步说，一件事物不是先验概念的产物，而是基于观念联结的偶然性。康德无法容忍这一点，所以他发展了一种超验批判来确定必要性。他评论道：“大卫·休谟认识到，为了让我们能够做到这一点，这些概念的起源必须是先验的。\n\n131\n\n第三章网络空间\n\n121","previous_page":120,"next_page":122}