{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","id":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","uuid":"0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title":"论数码物的存在","normalized_title":"论数码物的存在","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787208154346","isbns":["9787208154346"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":317,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%AE%BA%E6%95%B0%E7%A0%81%E7%89%A9%E7%9A%84%E5%AD%98%E5%9C%A8","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/0f4df77e-fbc5-46b5-aca2-e27886d75b12/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"121 / 111","pdf_page":121,"physical_index":121,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c26442f4a519a395de3297a82e8bda0f96d43eb0f075b61e8cd23e23cf516feb"},"chapter":"第三章","content":"亚里士多德的相关性与中世纪诠释困境\n\n如海德格尔所称，关系理论总是受到其一般性的损害。然而，自亚里士多德哲学始，对它的思考总是摇摆不定。在《范畴篇》的第七章中，亚里士多德首先将关系确定为以下十个范畴之一：实体、数量、性质、关系、地点、时间、姿势、状态、动作与承受(受到影响的意义上)。我们译为“关系”的范畴由亚里士多德命名为 ta pros ti(τà πρós τt),它字面上意味“对于某物而言”。[24]亚里士多德对这一特殊范畴显得相当犹豫不决，因为一个全面的定义似乎是不可能的。在后面的章节中，亚里士多德增加了另外五个关系范畴，即对立、优先性、同时性、运动与拥有。究竟是什么使得关系如此难以界定?他给出了以下定义：\n\n那些被称为相关的东西，要么谓述别的东西，要么与别的东西相关，都是通过参照另一事物来解释的。[25]\n\n他接着用相互性与自发性来解释不同类型的关系。因此，如果遵循亚里士多德的逻辑，我们可以推导出以下三个结论：(1)关系是与实体相关的项；(2)与实体相关的项是偶性；(3)实体不是关系。[26]在《形而上学》第五卷15中，亚里士多德再次讨论了关系问题，在这里他将三种关系分类，包括(1)等同关系(例如，两倍与一半，三倍与三分之一)；(2)因果关系(例如，行动与激情之间，加热与被加热之间)；以及(3)心理关系(例如,衡量与被测量者)。[27]在所有情况下,实体与关系\n\n第三章网络空间\n\n121\n\n111","previous_page":120,"next_page":122}